Key takeaways
- A British punitive expedition captured Benin City in February 1897 and looted its palace.
- The Oba Ovonramwen was exiled; thousands of works ended up in museums and private hands abroad.
- Several institutions have returned objects, and the debate over restitution continues.
In February 1897 British troops entered Benin City, then the capital of one of West Africa’s oldest kingdoms, and set it on fire. They left with thousands of works of art, among them the cast plaques and heads known as the Benin Bronzes. Today those works sit in museums across Europe and North America, and the dispute over them has become a test case for how the world reckons with empire.
The expedition
The raid was a response to a January incident in which a British delegation, led by acting consul-general James Phillips, was ambushed and most of its members killed on the way to Benin. Britain sent a punitive expedition. The city fell within days, the palace was looted, and the Oba, Ovonramwen, was captured and exiled to Calabar, where he died in 1914. The kingdom was absorbed into the Niger Coast Protectorate.
The objects
The plaques, heads and ivories had been made for the Oba’s court over centuries by guilds of skilled artisans, many cast in brass by the lost-wax method. They recorded the kingdom’s history, ceremonies and diplomacy. After the raid, officers and officials sold or kept them. Many were purchased by museums, including the British Museum and institutions in Germany and the United States, and European artists were astonished by their sophistication, which challenged racist assumptions about African art.
The debate today
Calls for return have grown. Several institutions, among them universities and museums in the UK, Germany and the United States, have handed back or agreed to transfer objects, and Germany formally transferred ownership of hundreds of works in 2022. Others cite legal restrictions, such as the British Museum Act of 1963. Plans for a new museum in Benin City, supported by international partners, are intended to receive returned works.
Editorial assessment
The strongest argument for return is that these objects were taken by force in a war of conquest, and that they are central to the identity of the people who made them. The strongest counter-arguments concern conservation, access and the principle of universal museums, though the force of these weakens as museums in Nigeria expand. The question is no longer whether this history must be confronted, but how, and who decides.
Questions to think about
- Does an object’s long residence in a museum create a claim to it?
- What would a fair arrangement look like for institutions and for the Edo people?
Disagree? Say why in the discussion below. Good arguments change minds.
References and sources
- Barnaby Phillips, Loot: Britain and the Benin Bronzes (2021)
- Dan Hicks, The Brutish Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution (2020)
Discussion
Challenge the argument, not the person. Community guidelines